'The West is fighting to the last Ukrainian': the proxy war myth
Kremlin Lies
Ukraine is merely a Western tool in the fight against Russia. The US and NATO are fighting 'to the last Ukrainian,' using them as cannon fodder
Facts
Ukraine defends its independence by its own choice. Over 80% of Ukrainians support defending their country. Western aid enables Ukraine to resist aggression — it does not impose war upon it
The narrative
The Kremlin (and some Western politicians) claim:
- Ukraine is a Western “puppet” fighting for foreign interests
- The US is “using” Ukrainians to weaken Russia
- Without Western pressure, Ukraine would have surrendered long ago
- Western weapons “prolong suffering” rather than help
Goal: convince both Western and Ukrainian audiences that continued aid = continued killing.
What Ukrainians themselves say
Polls
KIIS (Kyiv International Institute of Sociology), 2023–2024:
- 87% of Ukrainians believe Ukraine should continue armed resistance
- 78% oppose any territorial concessions
- Less than 10% support capitulation on any terms
Rating Group, 2024:
- 83% believe in victory
- 57% trust Zelenskyy
- Support for continuing the fight remains consistently high even after 2+ years of war
Volunteers
From the first days of the invasion, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians voluntarily joined the Armed Forces, Territorial Defence, and volunteer organizations. Queues at recruitment centres are not “Western coercion.”
Why this is not a “proxy war”
A proxy war is when one state fights on behalf of another, for foreign interests.
Ukraine:
- Fights for its own existence as an independent state
- Defends its own territory, its own cities, its own citizens
- Decided to resist independently — before Western aid began arriving en masse
- Held the line in the first weeks of war with virtually no heavy Western weapons
For comparison, actual proxy wars:
- Korea (1950–1953) — North Korea fought for Soviet and Chinese interests
- Vietnam — North Vietnam received Soviet weapons to “export revolution”
- Afghanistan (1979–1989) — the Mujahideen were supported by the US to weaken the USSR
The difference: Ukraine chooses its own path — as it did in 1991 (referendum), 2004 (Orange Revolution), 2014 (Euromaidan).
The alternative: what happens without aid
If the West stops helping:
- Russia will seize all of Ukraine (or most of it)
- Millions of Ukrainians will end up under occupation (Bucha, Izium show what that means)
- The refugee flow to Europe will multiply
- Russia will get a precedent: aggression pays off
- Next targets: Moldova, Georgia, the Baltics
“Aid prolongs the war” is like saying a fire extinguisher prolongs a fire.
Conclusion
The “war to the last Ukrainian” narrative is a weapon against Western support. Its purpose is to make the West abandon aid so Russia can finish destroying Ukraine. Ukrainians fight for themselves, for their land, for their future — and they themselves ask for help.
Sources
Related Articles
'Boris Johnson Derailed the Peace Deal': How Russia Shifts the Blame
Debunking the myth of the 'derailed Istanbul agreement': what Russia actually proposed, why Ukraine refused, and the role of Bucha.
'Why Doesn't Ukraine Just Give Up the Land for Peace?'
Why 'just giving up land' is not a path to peace but an invitation to further aggression. What is happening in the occupied territories and why Ukraine cannot surrender.
'Western Weapons Are Being Sold on the Black Market': A Fake Traced to the Kremlin
Why the myth about a Ukrainian arms 'black market' is fabricated: investigations, tracking systems, and the real facts.
The Full-Scale Invasion of 2022 — Aggression, Not a 'Defensive Operation'
Debunking the justifications for Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Facts, figures, and international legal assessments of the aggression.